Searching the open web for market signals
A separate research tool from the company-by-company pipeline: instead of starting from a company, this one starts from a topic, for example government transport-subsidy policy, and comes back with a small number of scored, evidence-backed developments instead of a pile of raw search results.
One topic becomes several searches, across several kinds of source
A single request, for example "government subsidies for NDIS transport", is expanded into multiple query variations (this run used eight) rather than searched verbatim once, and run across five source types at the same time: government and regulatory publications, news, the open web, X, and Threads. Each source tracks and reports its own completion independently, so one source failing (in this run, Threads returned no results) doesn't stop the others or hide that it happened.
Raw mentions get collapsed into a handful of scored signals
One completed run here pulled 159 mentions across sources and collapsed them into 4 meaningful signals, not 159 things to read. Each signal carries a relevance, importance, and confidence score, a plain-language "why this matters," a list of key entities and key developments, and the specific sources and mentions it was built from, so a claim can always be traced back to where it came from rather than taken on faith.
A separate lens from the company-by-company research runs
This tool answers "what's changing in a market or a topic," not "which companies should I call," which is why it's a separate workflow from the research runs described elsewhere on this page rather than a step bolted onto them: one starts from a topic and returns developments, the other starts from a targeting profile and returns ranked companies.